A3. Assess and give feedback to learners
My teaching experience within the Fashion Journalism and Content creation course at LCF involves not only the analysis and evaluation of all the broadcast submissions, but also the cross-programme modules that the students are required to complete. The course emphasises the need for quality feedback from the very start and is engrained in my practice.
Students with ‘well-developed feedback literacy’ are those who:
- appreciate their own active role in feedback processes.
- are continuously developing capacities in making sound judgements about academic work
- manage affect in positive ways
[Carless and Boud, 2018: 1318]

We embed the review process throughout, not just at the assessment time. Currently this is a very high priority in our school and something which is done informally in focus groups and formally via the NSS (National Student Survey) [1]
The team and I constantly review this feedback and use it to structure our teaching (as referenced in my A1 Designing and planning for learning submission)
The assessment process starts with a benchmarking meeting. This meeting of the faculty identifies 3 or more pieces of work from various students across the grading spectrums. This benchmarking approach allows the members of staff marking to provide uniformity in their approach to evaluation but also to be objective and specific in terms of learning outcomes.
When recording our assessments, it is broken down according to the learning income with the inclusion of critique and positive feedforwards. Once the assessments are published, the course also offers the opportunity for students to discuss their feedback in a tutorial environment. When giving feedback, my goal is to be accurate, fair, and precise. I incorporate this into my practice to include feedback as a teaching opportunity, involving the use of questions that arise from the submission for the student in conjunction with my own interpretation of the outcome.
After reflection, the teaching teams’ latest approach is to break down the evaluation by providing explanatory critique based on the student’s coverage of each learning outcome, this includes highlighting the positives and identifying areas of improvement. The assessment is then surmised with a feedforward and positive recognition of their submission.

Upon publication of the results, we provide students with a feedback tutorial as a chance to explain their grade for those who need further clarification. As pointed out in both my designing and planning for learning and the teaching and supporting student learning statements, feedback and reflection are at the core of our practice.
Reflection of my teaching practice is something I engage in regularly; my own personal statement is that if I can be given a more effective way of achieving the task and increasing engagement then why not take full advantage of it. Feedback provides constant motivation to both staff and students. Our team has embedded peer reviews as well as making this part of our appraisals.

[1] https://www.thestudentsurvey.com